Land tenure, peer effects, ethnicity, child health, impact evaluation, urban economics
The Price of Empowerment: Experimental Evidence on Land Titling in Tanzania (2014) – CGD Working Paper with Daniel Ayalew Ali, Klaus Deininger, Stefan Dercon, Justin Sandefur and Andrew Zeitlin.
We report on a randomized field experiment using price incentives to address both economic and gender inequality in land tenure formalization. During the 1990s and 2000s, nearly two dozen African countries proposed de jure land reforms extending access to formal, freehold land tenure to millions of poor households. Many of these reforms stalled. Titled land remains the de facto preserve of wealthy households and, within households, men. Beginning in 2010, we tested whether price instruments alone can generate greater inclusion by offering formal titles to residents of a low-income, unplanned settlement in Dar es Salaam at a range of subsidized prices, as well as additional price incentives to include women as owners or co-owners of household land. Estimated price elasticities of demand confirm that prices-rather than other implementation failures or features of the titling regime-are a key obstacle to broader inclusion in the land registry, and that some degree of pro-poor price discrimination is justified even from a narrow budgetary perspective. In terms of gender inequality, we find that even small price incentives for female co-titling achieve almost complete gender parity in land ownership with no reduction in demand.
In English: We randomly varied the fees people had to pay to get a land title and find (reassuringly) that people with lower fees are more likely to sign up. Making it a requirement that a woman should be listed as a co-owner doesn’t dissuade people, but it does get women listed on tiles.
Tribe or title? Ethnic enclaves and the demand for formal land tenure in a Tanzanian slum (2013) – CSAE Working Paper
This paper examines the relationship between ethnic heterogeneity and the demand for formal land tenure in urban Tanzania. Using a unique census of two highly-fractionalized unplanned settlements in Dar es Salaam, I show that households located near coethnics are significantly less likely to purchase a limited form of land tenure recently offered by the government. I attempt to address one of the chief concerns – endogenous sorting of households – by conditioning on a household’s choice of coethnics neighbors upon arrival in the neighborhood. I also find that coethnic residence predicts lower levels of perceived expropriation risk, but not perceived access to credit nor contribution to local public goods. These results suggest that close-knit ethnic groups may be less likely to accept state-provided goods due to their ability to generate reasonable substitutes, in this case protection from expropriation. The results are robust to different definitions of coethnicity and spatial cut-offs, controls for family ties and religious similarity as well as spatial fixed effects. Finally, the main result is confirmed using a large-scale administrative data-set covering over 20,000 land parcels in the city, exploiting ethnically-unique last names to predict tribal affiliation.
In English: People living near others of the same tribe are less likely to sign up for a formal land title, probably because they are already feel protected.
Peer effects in the adoption of property rights: experimental evidence from urban Tanzania (2013)
This paper investigates the presence of endogenous peer effects in the adoption of formal property rights. Using data from a unique land titling experiment held in an unplanned settlement in Dar es Salaam, I show a strong, positive impact of neighbour adoption on the household’s choice to purchase a land title. I also show that this relationship holds in a separate, identical experiment held a year later in a nearby community, as well as in administrative data for over 160,000 land parcels in the same city. While the exact channel is undetermined, evidence points towards complementarities in the reduction in expropriation risk, as peer effects are strongest between households living close to each other and there is some evidence that peer effects are strongest for households most concerned with expropriation. The results show that, for better or for worse, households will reinforce each other’s decisions to enter formal tenure systems.
In English: People are more likely to sign up for land titles when their neighbours sign up for land titles, probably because they believe the value of the title is greater when everyone else has one.
Persistence in the effect of birth order on child development: evidence from the Philippines (2013)
This paper investigates birth order effects on both anthropometric and education
outcomes in a longitudinal survey of children from the Philippines, the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey (CLHNS). Birth order effects are present earlyin life for both anthropometric and educational outcomes, but attenuate as children approach adulthood. There is also evidence for nonlinear birth order effects, with both first-born and last-born children holding an advantage over middle-born children. These results are at odds with prevalent theories of birth order, which predict lasting and monotonic differences in outcomes across children of different birth order.
In English: Later born children are shorter and start school later, but by the time they are adults they are the same height and have the same amount of schooling as earlier born children. Huh?
Blogs I’ve written for CGD can be found here.
“How not to help Haiti” Foreign Policy, February 2010